On 09/23/2016 10:02 AM, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
> As discussed on the list [1], having a comment stating that this file
> is "public domain" is arguably wrong and not legally binding. This patch
> replaces that comment with a clear GPLv2+ license as proposed in [2].
>
> [1] http://lists.nongnu.org
As discussed on the list [1], having a comment stating that this file
is "public domain" is arguably wrong and not legally binding. This patch
replaces that comment with a clear GPLv2+ license as proposed in [2].
[1] http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-09/msg06151.html
[2] http://
