Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for 4.1 0/2] avoid lseek on block_status

22.05.2019 13:47, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 08.04.2019 um 18:26 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben: >> Hi! >> >> It's a continuation for >> "[PATCH] qcow2: avoid lseek on block_status if possible" >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-01/msg06598.html >> >> performance result

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for 4.1 0/2] avoid lseek on block_status

Am 08.04.2019 um 18:26 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben: > Hi! > > It's a continuation for > "[PATCH] qcow2: avoid lseek on block_status if possible" > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-01/msg06598.html > > performance results for block-status on tmpfs [tests original

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for 4.1 0/2] avoid lseek on block_status

ping2 Hi! My approach of adding perf test disliked by Max in other thread, so 01 may be just skipped. What about 02? 08.04.2019 19:26, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > Hi! > > It's a continuation for > "[PATCH] qcow2: avoid lseek on block_status if possible" > https://lists.gnu.org/archiv

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for 4.1 0/2] avoid lseek on block_status

ping 08.04.2019 19:26, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > Hi! > > It's a continuation for > "[PATCH] qcow2: avoid lseek on block_status if possible" > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-01/msg06598.html > > performance results for block-status on tmpfs [tests originally by Kev

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for 4.1 0/2] avoid lseek on block_status

Hi! It's a continuation for "[PATCH] qcow2: avoid lseek on block_status if possible" https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-01/msg06598.html performance results for block-status on tmpfs [tests originally by Kevin, now they are in 01]: ./tests/perf/block/qcow2/convert-blockstatus /ra