On 27 December 2013 15:17, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 12/26/2013 02:34 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Looking a bit more closely, is it even possible for code64 to be
>> 1 if we're in real or vm86 mode? If not, then the behaviour here
>> is unchanged (ie still always zero extends).
>
> No, real or
On 12/26/2013 02:34 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Looking a bit more closely, is it even possible for code64 to be
> 1 if we're in real or vm86 mode? If not, then the behaviour here
> is unchanged (ie still always zero extends).
No, real or vm86 mode implies 16-bit.
r~
On 26 December 2013 19:10, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 12/26/2013 10:58 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> @@ -6231,7 +6214,7 @@ static target_ulong disas_insn(CPUX86State *env,
>>> DisasContext *s,
>>> exception */
>>> gen_op_jmp_T0();
>>> /* pop selector */
On 12/26/2013 10:58 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 29 November 2013 03:00, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> Merge gen_op_addl_A0_im and gen_op_addq_A0_im into gen_add_A0_im
>> and clean up the ifdef.
>>
>> Replace the one remaining user of gen_op_addl_A0_im with gen_add_A0_im.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richa
On 29 November 2013 03:00, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Merge gen_op_addl_A0_im and gen_op_addq_A0_im into gen_add_A0_im
> and clean up the ifdef.
>
> Replace the one remaining user of gen_op_addl_A0_im with gen_add_A0_im.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> ---
> target-i386/translate.c | 27 +
Merge gen_op_addl_A0_im and gen_op_addq_A0_im into gen_add_A0_im
and clean up the ifdef.
Replace the one remaining user of gen_op_addl_A0_im with gen_add_A0_im.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
target-i386/translate.c | 27 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 22 del
