David Hildenbrand writes:
> On 20.11.18 18:26, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 11/20/18 11:20 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> On 11/20/18 11:06 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/20/18 3:25 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Test that very big/small values are not accepted and that ranges with
> only one ele
On 20.11.18 18:26, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/20/18 11:20 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 11/20/18 11:06 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> On 11/20/18 3:25 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Test that very big/small values are not accepted and that ranges with
only one element work. Also test that ranges ar
Eric Blake writes:
> On 11/20/18 11:20 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 11/20/18 11:06 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> On 11/20/18 3:25 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Test that very big/small values are not accepted and that ranges with
only one element work. Also test that ranges are ascending and
On 11/20/18 11:20 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/20/18 11:06 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/20/18 3:25 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Test that very big/small values are not accepted and that ranges with
only one element work. Also test that ranges are ascending and cannot
have more than 65536 elements
On 11/20/18 11:06 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/20/18 3:25 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Test that very big/small values are not accepted and that ranges with
only one element work. Also test that ranges are ascending and cannot
have more than 65536 elements.
Rename expect4 to expect5, as we will
On 11/20/18 3:25 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Test that very big/small values are not accepted and that ranges with
only one element work. Also test that ranges are ascending and cannot
have more than 65536 elements.
Rename expect4 to expect5, as we will be moving that to a separate ulist
test a
Test that very big/small values are not accepted and that ranges with
only one element work. Also test that ranges are ascending and cannot
have more than 65536 elements.
Rename expect4 to expect5, as we will be moving that to a separate ulist
test after the rework.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbra