(2012/02/14 6:37), Michael Roth wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:14:03AM +0900, MATSUDA, Daiki wrote:
And in this week, I tried your Windows Guest Agent patches. It is a
little hard way.
At the first I wrote my work.
0. my node OS is RHEL 6.1.
1. build some mingw packages (mingw32-gcc, mingw-3
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:14:03AM +0900, MATSUDA, Daiki wrote:
> >>And in this week, I tried your Windows Guest Agent patches. It is a
> >>little hard way.
> >>
> >>At the first I wrote my work.
> >>0. my node OS is RHEL 6.1.
> >>1. build some mingw packages (mingw32-gcc, mingw-32-glib2...)
> >>2.
(2012/02/10 13:51), Michael Roth wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:26:32AM +0900, MATSUDA, Daiki wrote:
(2012/02/04 2:07), Michael Roth wrote:
On 02/02/2012 10:25 PM, MATSUDA, Daiki wrote:
Hi, Michael!
Thank you for your working.
And I have a question the process id written in pid file.
If qe
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:26:32AM +0900, MATSUDA, Daiki wrote:
> (2012/02/04 2:07), Michael Roth wrote:
> >On 02/02/2012 10:25 PM, MATSUDA, Daiki wrote:
> >>Hi, Michael!
> >>Thank you for your working.
> >>
> >>And I have a question the process id written in pid file.
> >>If qemu-ga is ran as daem
(2012/02/04 2:07), Michael Roth wrote:
On 02/02/2012 10:25 PM, MATSUDA, Daiki wrote:
Hi, Michael!
Thank you for your working.
And I have a question the process id written in pid file.
If qemu-ga is ran as daemon, the parent process id not child is written
in pid file. So, id gotten by 'ps' comm
Hi, Michael!
Thank you for your working.
And I have a question the process id written in pid file.
If qemu-ga is ran as daemon, the parent process id not child is written
in pid file. So, id gotten by 'ps' command is different. Is it correct
work? Many other daemon writes child process id.
Regard
On 02/02/2012 10:25 PM, MATSUDA, Daiki wrote:
Hi, Michael!
Thank you for your working.
And I have a question the process id written in pid file.
If qemu-ga is ran as daemon, the parent process id not child is written
in pid file. So, id gotten by 'ps' command is different. Is it correct
work? Ma