On 09/13/2018 04:25 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 07:55:03AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> The new layout using static IRQ number does not leave much space to
>> the dynamic MSI range, only 0x100 IRQ numbers. Increase the total
>> number of IRQS for newer machines and introd
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 07:55:03AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> The new layout using static IRQ number does not leave much space to
> the dynamic MSI range, only 0x100 IRQ numbers. Increase the total
> number of IRQS for newer machines and introduce a legacy XICS backend
> for pre-3.1 machines
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 07:55:03 +0200
Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> The new layout using static IRQ number does not leave much space to
> the dynamic MSI range, only 0x100 IRQ numbers. Increase the total
> number of IRQS for newer machines and introduce a legacy XICS backend
> for pre-3.1 machines to ma
The new layout using static IRQ number does not leave much space to
the dynamic MSI range, only 0x100 IRQ numbers. Increase the total
number of IRQS for newer machines and introduce a legacy XICS backend
for pre-3.1 machines to maintain compatibility.
For the old backend, provide a 'nr_msis' value
