* Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
> VTD_RTADDR_RTT is dropped even by the VT-d spec, so QEMU should
> probably do the same thing (after all we never really implemented it).
> Since we've had a field for that in the migration stream, to keep
> compatibility we need to fill the hole up.
>
> Plea
> From: Peter Xu [mailto:pet...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 2:14 PM
> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] intel_iommu: Drop extended root field
>
> VTD_RTADDR_RTT is dropped even by the VT-d spec, so QEMU should
May be helpful to mention it is VT-d 3.0 which depreca
VTD_RTADDR_RTT is dropped even by the VT-d spec, so QEMU should
probably do the same thing (after all we never really implemented it).
Since we've had a field for that in the migration stream, to keep
compatibility we need to fill the hole up.
Please refer to VT-d spec 10.4.6.
Signed-off-by: Pete