On Wed, 07/19 18:31, Amador Pahim wrote:
> Current implementation is broken. It does not really test if the child
> process is running.
>
> The Popen.returncode will only be set after by a poll(), wait() or
> communicate(). If the Popen fails to launch a VM, the Popen.returncode
> will not turn to
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 03:34:47PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 06:31:06PM +0200, Amador Pahim wrote:
> > Current implementation is broken. It does not really test if the child
> > process is running.
> >
> > The Popen.returncode will only be set after by a poll(), wait(
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 06:31:06PM +0200, Amador Pahim wrote:
> Current implementation is broken. It does not really test if the child
> process is running.
>
> The Popen.returncode will only be set after by a poll(), wait() or
> communicate(). If the Popen fails to launch a VM, the Popen.returnco
Current implementation is broken. It does not really test if the child
process is running.
The Popen.returncode will only be set after by a poll(), wait() or
communicate(). If the Popen fails to launch a VM, the Popen.returncode
will not turn to None by itself.
Instead of using Popen.returncode,
