On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:45:23 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Right now, stop followed by an incoming migration will let the
> virtual machine start. cont before an incoming migration instead
> will fail.
>
> This is bad because the actual behavior is not predictable; it is
> racy with respect to t
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:35:58 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 22/10/2012 17:06, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> >> > Note that libvirt is currently working around the race by looping
> >> > if the MigrationExpected answer is returned. After this patch, the
> >> > command will return right away with
Il 22/10/2012 17:06, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
>> > Note that libvirt is currently working around the race by looping
>> > if the MigrationExpected answer is returned. After this patch, the
>> > command will return right away without ever raising an error.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
Right now, stop followed by an incoming migration will let the
virtual machine start. cont before an incoming migration instead
will fail.
This is bad because the actual behavior is not predictable; it is
racy with respect to the start of the incoming migration. That's
because incoming migration
