On 7/12/19 4:27 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
[snip]
>>>
>>> OK, that's our very last usable flag! Use it wisely!
>>>
>>
>> Hmm, maybe then I missed something. I thought the flag is 64-bit and
>> we have more room. Did I miss something ?
>
> The 64bit value written in the stream is
>(
* Singh, Brijesh (brijesh.si...@amd.com) wrote:
>
>
> On 7/11/19 12:34 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Singh, Brijesh (brijesh.si...@amd.com) wrote:
> >> When memory encryption is enabled, the guest memory will be encrypted with
> >> the guest specific key. The patch introduces RAM_SAVE_F
On 7/11/19 12:34 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Singh, Brijesh (brijesh.si...@amd.com) wrote:
>> When memory encryption is enabled, the guest memory will be encrypted with
>> the guest specific key. The patch introduces RAM_SAVE_FLAG_ENCRYPTED_PAGE
>> flag to distinguish the encrypted data
* Singh, Brijesh (brijesh.si...@amd.com) wrote:
> When memory encryption is enabled, the guest memory will be encrypted with
> the guest specific key. The patch introduces RAM_SAVE_FLAG_ENCRYPTED_PAGE
> flag to distinguish the encrypted data from plaintext. Encrypted pages
> may need special handli
When memory encryption is enabled, the guest memory will be encrypted with
the guest specific key. The patch introduces RAM_SAVE_FLAG_ENCRYPTED_PAGE
flag to distinguish the encrypted data from plaintext. Encrypted pages
may need special handling. The kvm_memcrypt_save_outgoing_page() is used
by the