On 7/22/19 9:28 AM, tony.ngu...@bt.com wrote:
> Do you prefer the v1 implementation of making TCGMemOp -> MemOp?
Yes, I did prefer moving the entire enum.
The use of MO_8 etc instead of MO_UB often emphasized that we were dealing only
with a size without a sign.
r~
On 7/22/19 8:59 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>On 7/22/19 8:34 AM, tony.ngu...@bt.com wrote:
>> Tony Nguyen (20):
>> tcg: Replace MO_8 with MO_UB alias
>> tcg: Replace MO_16 with MO_UW alias
>> tcg: Replace MO_32 with MO_UL alias
>> tcg: Replace MO_64 with MO_UQ alias
>> tcg: Move size+si
On 22/07/19 17:59, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 7/22/19 8:34 AM, tony.ngu...@bt.com wrote:
>> Tony Nguyen (20):
>> tcg: Replace MO_8 with MO_UB alias
>> tcg: Replace MO_16 with MO_UW alias
>> tcg: Replace MO_32 with MO_UL alias
>> tcg: Replace MO_64 with MO_UQ alias
>> tcg: Move size+sig
On 7/22/19 8:34 AM, tony.ngu...@bt.com wrote:
> Tony Nguyen (20):
> tcg: Replace MO_8 with MO_UB alias
> tcg: Replace MO_16 with MO_UW alias
> tcg: Replace MO_32 with MO_UL alias
> tcg: Replace MO_64 with MO_UQ alias
> tcg: Move size+sign+endian from TCGMemOp to MemOp
I don't like any of
This patchset implements the IE (Invert Endian) bit in SPARCv9 MMU TTE.
It is an attempt of the instructions outlined by Richard Henderson to Mark
Cave-Ayland.
Tested with OpenBSD on sun4u. Solaris 10 is my actual goal, but unfortunately a
separate keyboard issue remains in the way.
On 01/11/17
