Dear Paolo,
>
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 6:19 PM
>
> On 03/02/2016 13:08, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> > 22.56% qemu-kvm [.] address_space_translate
> > 13.29% qemu-kvm [.] qemu_get_ram_ptr
>
> We could g
On 03/02/2016 13:08, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> 22.56% qemu-kvm [.] address_space_translate
> 13.29% qemu-kvm [.] qemu_get_ram_ptr
We could get rid of qemu_get_ram_ptr by storing the RAMBlock pointer
into the memory region, instead of the ram_addr_t value. I'm ha
ia.h...@de.ibm.com; m...@redhat.com
> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/10] virtio/vring: optimization patches
>
> This includes two optimization of virtio:
>
> - "slimming down" VirtQueueElements by not including room for
> 1024 buffers. This makes malloc much fa
Hi,
> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/10] virtio/vring: optimization patches
>
> This includes two optimization of virtio:
>
> - "slimming down" VirtQueueElements by not including room for
> 1024 buffers. This makes malloc much faster.
>
> - op
This includes two optimization of virtio:
- "slimming down" VirtQueueElements by not including room for
1024 buffers. This makes malloc much faster.
- optimizations to limit the number of address_space_translate
calls in virtio.c, from Vincenzo and myself.
Thanks,
Paolo
v1->v2: improved c
