On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 06:05:39PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Andreas Färber writes:
>
> > I had a brief look at this series. Dropping redundant fields certainly
> > sounds good and after the lengthy QOM'ifications of IDE devices we seem
> > to no longer break any devices, but whether to c
Andreas Färber writes:
> I had a brief look at this series. Dropping redundant fields certainly
> sounds good and after the lengthy QOM'ifications of IDE devices we seem
> to no longer break any devices, but whether to check for device or
> BlockDriverState sounds more like a block topic to me...
I had a brief look at this series. Dropping redundant fields certainly
sounds good and after the lengthy QOM'ifications of IDE devices we seem
to no longer break any devices, but whether to check for device or
BlockDriverState sounds more like a block topic to me...
Regards,
Andreas
Am 18.12.2013
Ping?
arm...@redhat.com writes:
> From: Markus Armbruster
>
> Obvious cleanups possible since we no longer have the special case of
> a non-qdevified controller.
>
> v2:
> * Dropped PATCH 1/10 ide: Break all non-qdevified controllers
> Andreas qdevified them since; thanks!
> * Series renamed f
From: Markus Armbruster
Obvious cleanups possible since we no longer have the special case of
a non-qdevified controller.
v2:
* Dropped PATCH 1/10 ide: Break all non-qdevified controllers
Andreas qdevified them since; thanks!
* Series renamed from "Drop code for non-qdevified IDE, and clean up
