Am 06.03.2012 08:41, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
On 2012-03-05 10:06, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Grmbl. Was very hard to reproduce here (triggered once every few hours
with lots of interaction beforehand), but now I think I got the point
(recursion of if_start due to if_encap). Will rework the code to address
th
On 2012-03-05 10:06, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Grmbl. Was very hard to reproduce here (triggered once every few hours
> with lots of interaction beforehand), but now I think I got the point
> (recursion of if_start due to if_encap). Will rework the code to address
> this.
>
> Thanks for testing so far,
On 2012-03-02 22:05, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 02.03.2012 19:57, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
>> Well, this requeuing bug seems to have a long breath. Previous attempts
>> to fix it (mine included) neglected the fact that we need to walk the
>> queue of pending packets, not just restart from the beginning aft
Am 02.03.2012 19:57, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
Well, this requeuing bug seems to have a long breath. Previous attempts
to fix it (mine included) neglected the fact that we need to walk the
queue of pending packets, not just restart from the beginning after a
requeue. This version should get it Right(TM
Well, this requeuing bug seems to have a long breath. Previous attempts
to fix it (mine included) neglected the fact that we need to walk the
queue of pending packets, not just restart from the beginning after a
requeue. This version should get it Right(TM).
This also comes with a fix for resource
