Am 07.02.2014 um 15:47 hat Olaf Hering geschrieben:
> bdrv_acct_done was called unconditional. But in case the ioreq has no
> segments there is no matching bdrv_acct_start call. This could lead to
> bogus accounting values.
>
> Found by code inspection.
>
> Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering
> ---
> v2:
On Fri, Feb 07, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> added to my queue, I'll fix the tab manually
Thanks, sorry for the TAB.
Olaf
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Olaf Hering wrote:
> bdrv_acct_done was called unconditional. But in case the ioreq has no
> segments there is no matching bdrv_acct_start call. This could lead to
> bogus accounting values.
>
> Found by code inspection.
>
> Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering
added to my queue, I'll
bdrv_acct_done was called unconditional. But in case the ioreq has no
segments there is no matching bdrv_acct_start call. This could lead to
bogus accounting values.
Found by code inspection.
Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering
---
v2:
add comment /* fall through */
hw/block/xen_disk.c | 14 +