On 25 September 2015 at 13:38, Programmingkid wrote:
>
> On Sep 25, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Yes, but I was hoping for it in a format that works with
>> our patch-handling tools...
>
> What needs to be changed to make it work with the patch-handling tools?
Single email, plain-tex
On Sep 25, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 25 September 2015 at 12:58, Programmingkid
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 25, 2015, at 2:53 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>>> On 25 September 2015 at 11:24, Programmingkid
>>> wrote:
>>>
I don't think Mac OS X adds the -psn argument anymore.
On 25 September 2015 at 12:58, Programmingkid wrote:
>
> On Sep 25, 2015, at 2:53 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
>> On 25 September 2015 at 11:24, Programmingkid
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think Mac OS X adds the -psn argument anymore. It might have
>>> in the past, but I don't see any sign of it on M
On Sep 25, 2015, at 2:53 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 25 September 2015 at 11:24, Programmingkid
> wrote:
>
>> I don't think Mac OS X adds the -psn argument anymore. It might have
>> in the past, but I don't see any sign of it on Mac OS 10.6. I made
>> a test program and launched it from both
On 25 September 2015 at 11:24, Programmingkid wrote:
> I don't think Mac OS X adds the -psn argument anymore. It might have
> in the past, but I don't see any sign of it on Mac OS 10.6. I made
> a test program and launched it from both the terminal and the Finder.
> I didn't see the -psn argument
On Sep 25, 2015, at 12:21 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 25 September 2015 at 09:12, Programmingkid
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 25, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> (Also, isn't a simple test on gArgc going to cause us to put up
>>> the dialog box even if qemu was started from the command
On 25 September 2015 at 09:12, Programmingkid wrote:
>
> On Sep 25, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> (Also, isn't a simple test on gArgc going to cause us to put up
>> the dialog box even if qemu was started from the command line with
>> no arguments?)
>
> I suppose you are right. Will m
On Sep 25, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 23 September 2015 at 16:06, Programmingkid
> wrote:
>> Removes the open dialog code that runs when no arguments
>> are supplied with QEMU. Not everyone needs a hard drive
>> or cdrom to boot their target. A user might only need to
>> use t
On 23 September 2015 at 16:06, Programmingkid wrote:
> Removes the open dialog code that runs when no arguments
> are supplied with QEMU. Not everyone needs a hard drive
> or cdrom to boot their target. A user might only need to
> use their target's bios to do work. With that said,
> this patch re
Removes the open dialog code that runs when no arguments
are supplied with QEMU. Not everyone needs a hard drive
or cdrom to boot their target. A user might only need to
use their target's bios to do work. With that said,
this patch removes the unneeded open dialog code.
Signed-off-by: John Arbuc
10 matches
Mail list logo
