On 16/11/2016 11:26, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 16.11.2016 11:18, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 16/11/2016 11:14, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> The ppc64 postcopy test does not work with KVM-PR, and it is also
>>> causing annoying warning messages when run on a x86 host. So let's
>>> use KVM here only
On 16.11.2016 11:18, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
>
> On 16/11/2016 11:14, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> The ppc64 postcopy test does not work with KVM-PR, and it is also
>> causing annoying warning messages when run on a x86 host. So let's
>> use KVM here only if we know that we're running with KVM-HV (which
On 16/11/2016 11:14, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The ppc64 postcopy test does not work with KVM-PR, and it is also
> causing annoying warning messages when run on a x86 host. So let's
> use KVM here only if we know that we're running with KVM-HV (which
> automatically also means that we're running on a
The ppc64 postcopy test does not work with KVM-PR, and it is also
causing annoying warning messages when run on a x86 host. So let's
use KVM here only if we know that we're running with KVM-HV (which
automatically also means that we're running on a ppc64 host), and
use TCG otherwise.
Signed-off-by
