Looks good to me.
Casey
From: Alex Williamson [alex.william...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 11:01 AM
To: Gabriel Laupre
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; m...@redhat.com; jb-gnumli...@wisemo.com;
b...@makefile.in; Casey Leedom; Michael Boksanyi; Ani
Thank you Alex
The test which fails in the msix_init() is
pba_offset + pba_size > memory_region_size(pba_bar) because pba_offset will be
0x8000 and memory_region_size(pba_bar) equals 0x2000.
If we can catch this error before as you suggested I think it is better.
I will integrate the changes th
On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 17:30 -0700, Gabriel Laupre wrote:
> Fix pba_offset initialization value for Chelsio T5 Virtual Function
> device. The T5 hardware has a bug in it where it reports a Pending Interrupt
> Bit Array Offset of 0x8000 for its SR-IOV Virtual Functions instead
> of the 0x1000 that th
Fix pba_offset initialization value for Chelsio T5 Virtual Function
device. The T5 hardware has a bug in it where it reports a Pending Interrupt
Bit Array Offset of 0x8000 for its SR-IOV Virtual Functions instead
of the 0x1000 that the hardware actually uses internally. As the hardware
doesn't retu