Hi Eduardo,
On 3/7/19 6:26 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:06:39AM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
>> As NVDIMM support is looming for ARM and SPAPR, let's
>> move the acpi_nvdimm_state to the generic machine struct
>> instead of duplicating the same code in several machines.
>> I
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:06:39AM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
> As NVDIMM support is looming for ARM and SPAPR, let's
> move the acpi_nvdimm_state to the generic machine struct
> instead of duplicating the same code in several machines.
> It is also renamed into nvdimms_state.
>
> nvdimm and nvdimm-
On 3/7/19 5:58 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 04:15:21PM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Philippe, Eduardo,
>>
>> On 3/7/19 11:56 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> Hi Eric, Eduardo,
>>>
>>> On 3/7/19 10:06 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
As NVDIMM support is looming for ARM and
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 04:15:21PM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Philippe, Eduardo,
>
> On 3/7/19 11:56 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Hi Eric, Eduardo,
> >
> > On 3/7/19 10:06 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
> >> As NVDIMM support is looming for ARM and SPAPR, let's
> >> move the acpi_nvdimm_state
On 07.03.19 16:36, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 3/7/19 4:21 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 07.03.19 16:15, Auger Eric wrote:
>>> Hi Philippe, Eduardo,
>>>
>>> On 3/7/19 11:56 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Eric, Eduardo,
On 3/7/19 10:06 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
> As
On 07.03.19 16:15, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Philippe, Eduardo,
>
> On 3/7/19 11:56 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Hi Eric, Eduardo,
>>
>> On 3/7/19 10:06 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
>>> As NVDIMM support is looming for ARM and SPAPR, let's
>>> move the acpi_nvdimm_state to the generic machine struct
Hi Philippe, Eduardo,
On 3/7/19 11:56 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Eric, Eduardo,
>
> On 3/7/19 10:06 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
>> As NVDIMM support is looming for ARM and SPAPR, let's
>> move the acpi_nvdimm_state to the generic machine struct
>> instead of duplicating the same code in sev
On 3/7/19 4:21 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 07.03.19 16:15, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Philippe, Eduardo,
>>
>> On 3/7/19 11:56 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> Hi Eric, Eduardo,
>>>
>>> On 3/7/19 10:06 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
As NVDIMM support is looming for ARM and SPAPR, let's
mov
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:48:59AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
[...]
> > +static void machine_set_nvdimm_persistence(Object *obj, const char *value,
> > + Error **errp)
> > +{
> > +MachineState *ms = MACHINE(obj);
> > +AcpiNVDIMMState *nvdimms_s
Hi Eric, Eduardo,
On 3/7/19 10:06 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
> As NVDIMM support is looming for ARM and SPAPR, let's
> move the acpi_nvdimm_state to the generic machine struct
> instead of duplicating the same code in several machines.
> It is also renamed into nvdimms_state.
>
> nvdimm and nvdimm-per
On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 10:06:39 +0100
Eric Auger wrote:
> As NVDIMM support is looming for ARM and SPAPR, let's
> move the acpi_nvdimm_state to the generic machine struct
> instead of duplicating the same code in several machines.
> It is also renamed into nvdimms_state.
>
> nvdimm and nvdimm-persi
As NVDIMM support is looming for ARM and SPAPR, let's
move the acpi_nvdimm_state to the generic machine struct
instead of duplicating the same code in several machines.
It is also renamed into nvdimms_state.
nvdimm and nvdimm-persistence become generic machine options.
We also add a description fo
12 matches
Mail list logo
