On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 02:32:34PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 03/01/2017 11:59 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 11:29:47AM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> >>On 03/01/2017 11:18 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:03:47AM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> O
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:14:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2017年03月01日 11:23, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
[...]
> >While I agree this fixes the specific problem, we have the ordering
> >issue in many other places.
>
> Yes, just post a fix for virtio-pci with IOMMU. With this fix, we meet the
On 03/01/2017 11:59 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 11:29:47AM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 03/01/2017 11:18 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:03:47AM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 03/01/2017 06:14 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
[...]
Hi Jason,
I am not saying we
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 11:29:47AM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 03/01/2017 11:18 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:03:47AM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> >>On 03/01/2017 06:14 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >>Hi Jason,
> >>
> >>I am not saying we don't need to cre
On 03/01/2017 11:18 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:03:47AM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 03/01/2017 06:14 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
[...]
Hi Jason,
I am not saying we don't need to create the IOMMU before some other device,
I just don't think that the command line order shou
On 03/01/2017 10:43 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2017年03月01日 15:03, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 03/01/2017 06:14 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2017年03月01日 11:23, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:36:35AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 04:42:25PM +0200, Marcel Apfe
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:03:47AM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 03/01/2017 06:14 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
[...]
> Hi Jason,
>
> I am not saying we don't need to create the IOMMU before some other device,
> I just don't think that the command line order should matter to user.
>
> BTW, are yo
On 2017年03月01日 15:03, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 03/01/2017 06:14 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2017年03月01日 11:23, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:36:35AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 04:42:25PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 02/24/2017 06:29 AM, Peter
On 03/01/2017 06:14 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2017年03月01日 11:23, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:36:35AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 04:42:25PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 02/24/2017 06:29 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
Intel vIOMMU devices are created with
On 2017年03月01日 11:23, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:36:35AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 04:42:25PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 02/24/2017 06:29 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
Intel vIOMMU devices are created with "-device" parameter, while here
actually w
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:36:35AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 04:42:25PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > On 02/24/2017 06:29 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> > >Intel vIOMMU devices are created with "-device" parameter, while here
> > >actually we need to make sure the dmar device be
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 04:42:25PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 02/24/2017 06:29 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> >Intel vIOMMU devices are created with "-device" parameter, while here
> >actually we need to make sure the dmar device be created before other
> >PCI devices (like vfio-pci) so that we kno
On 02/24/2017 06:29 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
Intel vIOMMU devices are created with "-device" parameter, while here
actually we need to make sure the dmar device be created before other
PCI devices (like vfio-pci) so that we know iommu_fn will be setup
correctly before realizations of those PCI devices
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 01:35:10AM -0500, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:07:33AM -0500, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > > > Hello Peter,
> > >
> > > Hi, Pankaj!
> > >
> > > >
> > > > This solution looks to check dependency of 'vfio-pci' over
> > > > 'intel-iommu'
> >
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 01:35:10AM -0500, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:07:33AM -0500, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > > Hello Peter,
> >
> > Hi, Pankaj!
> >
> > >
> > > This solution looks to check dependency of 'vfio-pci' over 'intel-iommu'
> > > before 'intel-iommu' is no
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:07:33AM -0500, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > Hello Peter,
>
> Hi, Pankaj!
>
> >
> > This solution looks to check dependency of 'vfio-pci' over 'intel-iommu'
> > before 'intel-iommu' is not initialized.
> >
> > Overall it looks good to me, just a small nit below.
> >
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:07:33AM -0500, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> Hello Peter,
Hi, Pankaj!
>
> This solution looks to check dependency of 'vfio-pci' over 'intel-iommu'
> before 'intel-iommu' is not initialized.
>
> Overall it looks good to me, just a small nit below.
>
> >
> > Intel vIOMMU dev
Hello Peter,
This solution looks to check dependency of 'vfio-pci' over 'intel-iommu'
before 'intel-iommu' is not initialized.
Overall it looks good to me, just a small nit below.
>
> Intel vIOMMU devices are created with "-device" parameter, while here
> actually we need to make sure the dmar
Intel vIOMMU devices are created with "-device" parameter, while here
actually we need to make sure the dmar device be created before other
PCI devices (like vfio-pci) so that we know iommu_fn will be setup
correctly before realizations of those PCI devices (it is sensible that
PCI device fetch the
19 matches
Mail list logo
