Am 24.06.2013 um 08:13 schrieb Julio Guerra :
> 2013/6/24 Alexey Kardashevskiy :
>> On 06/21/2013 10:03 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21.06.2013, at 14:01, Julio Guerra wrote:
>>>
2013/6/21 Alexander Graf :
>
> On 26.05.2013, at 19:41, Julio Guerra wrote:
>
>> MPC
2013/6/24 Alexey Kardashevskiy :
> On 06/21/2013 10:03 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 21.06.2013, at 14:01, Julio Guerra wrote:
>>
>>> 2013/6/21 Alexander Graf :
On 26.05.2013, at 19:41, Julio Guerra wrote:
> MPC86xx processors are based on the e600 core, which is not the cas
On 06/21/2013 10:03 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 21.06.2013, at 14:01, Julio Guerra wrote:
>
>> 2013/6/21 Alexander Graf :
>>>
>>> On 26.05.2013, at 19:41, Julio Guerra wrote:
>>>
MPC86xx processors are based on the e600 core, which is not the case
in qemu where it is based on the 7
On 21.06.2013, at 14:01, Julio Guerra wrote:
> 2013/6/21 Alexander Graf :
>>
>> On 26.05.2013, at 19:41, Julio Guerra wrote:
>>
>>> MPC86xx processors are based on the e600 core, which is not the case
>>> in qemu where it is based on the 7400 processor.
>>>
>>> This patch creates the e600 core
2013/6/21 Alexander Graf :
>
> On 26.05.2013, at 19:41, Julio Guerra wrote:
>
>> MPC86xx processors are based on the e600 core, which is not the case
>> in qemu where it is based on the 7400 processor.
>>
>> This patch creates the e600 core and instantiates the MPC86xx
>> processors based on it. Th
On 26.05.2013, at 19:41, Julio Guerra wrote:
> MPC86xx processors are based on the e600 core, which is not the case
> in qemu where it is based on the 7400 processor.
>
> This patch creates the e600 core and instantiates the MPC86xx
> processors based on it. Therefore, adding the high BATs and t
2013/6/7 Julio Guerra :
>>>
>>> However I can't judge whether all that code is right for e600 and
>>> whether you may want to share some code with e500 / e5500 in some way?
>>> CC'ing some Freescale folks.
>>
>>
>> e600 is a very different core from e500/e5500. It is a 74xx derivative.
>> The only
>>
>> However I can't judge whether all that code is right for e600 and
>> whether you may want to share some code with e500 / e5500 in some way?
>> CC'ing some Freescale folks.
>
>
> e600 is a very different core from e500/e5500. It is a 74xx derivative.
> The only thing I can see that could be s
On 06/06/2013 06:44:31 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 26.05.2013 19:41, schrieb Julio Guerra:
> MPC86xx processors are based on the e600 core, which is not the case
> in qemu where it is based on the 7400 processor.
>
> This patch creates the e600 core and instantiates the MPC86xx
> processors base
Am 26.05.2013 19:41, schrieb Julio Guerra:
> MPC86xx processors are based on the e600 core, which is not the case
> in qemu where it is based on the 7400 processor.
>
> This patch creates the e600 core and instantiates the MPC86xx
> processors based on it. Therefore, adding the high BATs and the S
ping
2013/5/26 Julio Guerra :
> MPC86xx processors are based on the e600 core, which is not the case
> in qemu where it is based on the 7400 processor.
>
> This patch creates the e600 core and instantiates the MPC86xx
> processors based on it. Therefore, adding the high BATs and the SPRG
> 4..7 re
MPC86xx processors are based on the e600 core, which is not the case
in qemu where it is based on the 7400 processor.
This patch creates the e600 core and instantiates the MPC86xx
processors based on it. Therefore, adding the high BATs and the SPRG
4..7 registers, which are e600-specific [1].
Thi
12 matches
Mail list logo
