On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 04:28:56PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, 02/20 00:08, Jeff Cody wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 01:01:38PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > On Wed, 02/19 16:17, Jeff Cody wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:42:23PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > > > This makes use o
On Thu, 02/20 00:08, Jeff Cody wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 01:01:38PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Wed, 02/19 16:17, Jeff Cody wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:42:23PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > > This makes use of op_blocker and blocks all the operations except for
> > > > commit
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 01:01:38PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Wed, 02/19 16:17, Jeff Cody wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:42:23PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > This makes use of op_blocker and blocks all the operations except for
> > > commit target, on each BlockDriverState->backing_hd.
>
On Wed, 02/19 16:17, Jeff Cody wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:42:23PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > This makes use of op_blocker and blocks all the operations except for
> > commit target, on each BlockDriverState->backing_hd.
> >
> > The asserts for op_blocker in bdrv_swap are removed because
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:42:23PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> This makes use of op_blocker and blocks all the operations except for
> commit target, on each BlockDriverState->backing_hd.
>
> The asserts for op_blocker in bdrv_swap are removed because with this
> change, the target of block commit h
The Wednesday 19 Feb 2014 à 21:42:23 (+0800), Fam Zheng wrote :
> This makes use of op_blocker and blocks all the operations except for
> commit target, on each BlockDriverState->backing_hd.
>
> The asserts for op_blocker in bdrv_swap are removed because with this
> change, the target of block com
This makes use of op_blocker and blocks all the operations except for
commit target, on each BlockDriverState->backing_hd.
The asserts for op_blocker in bdrv_swap are removed because with this
change, the target of block commit has at least the backing blocker of
its child, so the assertion is not
