On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:39:28AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 07:33:49PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:09:48PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
> > > Hi Marcelo,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:19:08AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > > On Fri
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 07:33:49PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:09:48PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
> > Hi Marcelo,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:19:08AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 03:17:39PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:09:48PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
> Hi Marcelo,
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:19:08AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 03:17:39PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Hu Tao wrote:
> > > > But in the case of panic notifica
Hi Marcelo,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:19:08AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 03:17:39PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Hu Tao wrote:
> > > But in the case of panic notification, more dependency means more
> > > chances of failure of panic n
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 03:17:39PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Hu Tao wrote:
> > But in the case of panic notification, more dependency means more
> > chances of failure of panic notification. Say, if we use a virtio device
> > to do panic notification, then we will
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Hu Tao wrote:
> But in the case of panic notification, more dependency means more
> chances of failure of panic notification. Say, if we use a virtio device
> to do panic notification, then we will fail if: virtio itself has
> problems, virtio for some reason can't
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:30:02PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > At 10/31/2012 09:12 AM, Marcelo Tosatti Wrote:
> >> It has been asked earlier why a simple virtio device is not usable
> >> for this (with no response IIRC).
> >
> > 1. We can't
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:30:02PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > At 10/31/2012 09:12 AM, Marcelo Tosatti Wrote:
> >> It has been asked earlier why a simple virtio device is not usable
> >> for this (with no response IIRC).
> >
> > 1. We can't
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 10/31/2012 09:12 AM, Marcelo Tosatti Wrote:
>> It has been asked earlier why a simple virtio device is not usable
>> for this (with no response IIRC).
>
> 1. We can't use virtio device when the kernel is booting.
So the issue here is the s
At 10/31/2012 09:12 AM, Marcelo Tosatti Wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:42:32AM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
>> We can know the guest is panicked when the guest runs on xen.
>> But we do not have such feature on kvm.
>>
>> Another purpose of this feature is: management app(for example:
>> libvirt) can
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:42:32AM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
> We can know the guest is panicked when the guest runs on xen.
> But we do not have such feature on kvm.
>
> Another purpose of this feature is: management app(for example:
> libvirt) can do auto dump when the guest is panicked. If managemen
We can know the guest is panicked when the guest runs on xen.
But we do not have such feature on kvm.
Another purpose of this feature is: management app(for example:
libvirt) can do auto dump when the guest is panicked. If management
app does not do auto dump, the guest's user can do dump by hand
12 matches
Mail list logo
