On 04/26/2017 08:46 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> We had some conflicting documentation: a nice 8-way table that
> described all possible combinations of DATA, ZERO, and
> OFFSET_VALID, couple with text that implied that OFFSET_VALID
> always meant raw data could be read directly. As the 8-way
> table i
On 27.04.2017 03:46, Eric Blake wrote:
> We had some conflicting documentation: a nice 8-way table that
> described all possible combinations of DATA, ZERO, and
> OFFSET_VALID, couple with text that implied that OFFSET_VALID
> always meant raw data could be read directly. As the 8-way
> table is t
We had some conflicting documentation: a nice 8-way table that
described all possible combinations of DATA, ZERO, and
OFFSET_VALID, couple with text that implied that OFFSET_VALID
always meant raw data could be read directly. As the 8-way
table is the intended semantics, simplify the rest of the t
