On 19.11.18 20:51, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Copying Igor and Eduardo for a hostmem.c bug. Search for "core dumped".
>
> David Hildenbrand writes:
>
Tests have to be fixed up:
- Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now
- The string-input-visitor now actually returns a par
Copying Igor and Eduardo for a hostmem.c bug. Search for "core dumped".
David Hildenbrand writes:
>>>
>>> Tests have to be fixed up:
>>> - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now
>>> - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not
>>> an ordered set.
>>
>> I'd expect
>>
>> Tests have to be fixed up:
>> - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now
>> - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not
>> an ordered set.
>
> I'd expect this to necessitate an update of callers that expect a set, but...
>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand
>
David Hildenbrand writes:
> The input visitor has some problems right now, especially
> - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in
> inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code
> - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not
> supported and err
The input visitor has some problems right now, especially
- unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in
inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code
- uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not
supported and error messages are misleading
- lists/ran
