On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:43:48PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 11 September 2015 at 15:40, Edgar E. Iglesias
> wrote:
> > In the interest avoiding duplication, do you think the following makes
> > sense for regs with the el3_aa32ns_aa64any access checks?
> >
> > 1. Use STATE_BOTH for "low-act
On 11 September 2015 at 15:40, Edgar E. Iglesias
wrote:
> In the interest avoiding duplication, do you think the following makes
> sense for regs with the el3_aa32ns_aa64any access checks?
>
> 1. Use STATE_BOTH for "low-activity" registers (e.g the EL3 view when EL2
> does not exist).
> 2. Use ST
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 03:19:37PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 3 September 2015 at 21:14, Edgar E. Iglesias
> wrote:
> > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias
> > ---
> > target-arm/cpu.h| 1 +
> > target-arm/helper.c | 28 ++--
> >
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 03:19:37PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 3 September 2015 at 21:14, Edgar E. Iglesias
> wrote:
> > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias
> > ---
> > target-arm/cpu.h| 1 +
> > target-arm/helper.c | 28 ++--
> >
On 3 September 2015 at 21:14, Edgar E. Iglesias
wrote:
> From: "Edgar E. Iglesias"
>
> Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias
> ---
> target-arm/cpu.h| 1 +
> target-arm/helper.c | 28 ++--
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/cp
From: "Edgar E. Iglesias"
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias
---
target-arm/cpu.h| 1 +
target-arm/helper.c | 28 ++--
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-arm/cpu.h b/target-arm/cpu.h
index 31825d3..ba22e12 100644
--- a/target-arm/cp
