On 19 February 2013 00:52, Peter Crosthwaite
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> On 8 February 2013 04:03, Peter Crosthwaite
>> wrote:
>> Generally I like these patches, but I'm curious about what your use
>> case is where you don't just create an entire a9mpcore
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 8 February 2013 04:03, Peter Crosthwaite
> wrote:
>> Patches 1-3 and 5 are trivial code cleanup and may be candidate to go
>> via trivial queue inpdependent of review of this work. Patch 4 unifies
>> the MPTimer and WDT into one device. M
On 8 February 2013 04:03, Peter Crosthwaite
wrote:
> Patches 1-3 and 5 are trivial code cleanup and may be candidate to go
> via trivial queue inpdependent of review of this work. Patch 4 unifies
> the MPTimer and WDT into one device. My motivation for doing this is
> so I can dynamically create o
Patches 1-3 and 5 are trivial code cleanup and may be candidate to go via
trivial queue inpdependent of review of this work. Patch 4 unifies the MPTimer
and WDT into one device. My motivation for doing this is so I can dynamically
create one without the other (Im throwing away MPCore altogether
