On 19.09.19 18:01, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 9/19/19 2:41 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> +/* prepare the buffers - two consecutive pages */
>>> +src = valloc(ALLOC_SIZE);
>>> +dst = valloc(ALLOC_SIZE);
>>
>> If anybody cares, I can convert the obsolete valloc into a
>> posix_memal
On 9/19/19 2:41 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> +/* prepare the buffers - two consecutive pages */
>> +src = valloc(ALLOC_SIZE);
>> +dst = valloc(ALLOC_SIZE);
>
> If anybody cares, I can convert the obsolete valloc into a
> posix_memalign(&src, 4096, ALLOC_SIZE) etc.
I don't care. It
On 19.09.19 11:28, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Let's add a test that especially verifies that no data will be touched
> in case we cross page boundaries and one page access triggers a fault.
>
> Before the fault-safe handling fixes, the test failes with:
> TESTmvc on s390x
> data modi
Let's add a test that especially verifies that no data will be touched
in case we cross page boundaries and one page access triggers a fault.
Before the fault-safe handling fixes, the test failes with:
TESTmvc on s390x
data modified during a fault
make[2]: *** [../Makefile.target
