> >> Blue, this does not trigger the missing braces warning:
> >
> > Do you mean the bug is that it can not trigger missing
> braces warining?
>
> The script fails to detect missing braces as marked below.
>
> > It seems that there is no missing braces in my patch, but some
> > unnecessary braces.
On 2011-05-31 09:39, BrillyWu wrote:
> Hi, Jan
>
>>> I am sure I have checked it with the scripts/checkpatch.pl, and it
>>> shows no error or warning. Maybe I should check whether my windows
>>> editor and mail client can work well before sending it to
>> you. I 'm
>>> sorry.
>>
>> Sorry, you are
Hi, Jan
> > I am sure I have checked it with the scripts/checkpatch.pl, and it
> > shows no error or warning. Maybe I should check whether my windows
> > editor and mail client can work well before sending it to
> you. I 'm
> > sorry.
>
> Sorry, you are right. Your patch revealed a bug in the che
On 2011-05-31 03:25, BrillyWu wrote:
> Hi, Jan
>
>> patch which has
>>> been checked. It can be compiled without any error and work
>> normally.
>>> The patch v3 is here now.
>>
>> The above text can't be used as a commit log, so this needs to be
>> fixed.
>> Moreover, your patch still con
Hi, Jan
> patch which has
> > been checked. It can be compiled without any error and work
> normally.
> > The patch v3 is here now.
>
> The above text can't be used as a commit log, so this needs to be
> fixed.
> Moreover, your patch still contains at least on style issues
> scripts/checkp
On 2011-05-30 10:59, BrillyWu wrote:
> From brill...@viatech.com.cn
> Hi, Jan
> Thank you for you review and guide.
> I have fixed the bugs and re-generated a clean patch which has
> been checked. It can be compiled
> without any error and work normally.
> The patch v3 is he
>From brill...@viatech.com.cn
Hi, Jan
Thank you for you review and guide.
I have fixed the bugs and re-generated a clean patch which has
been checked. It can be compiled
without any error and work normally.
The patch v3 is here now.
Signed-off-by: BrillyWu
Signed-off-by: Ka
On 2011-05-30 09:40, BrillyWu wrote:
> From: BrillyWu
>
> Hi, Jan
> I'm very sorry for these bugs in the patch. Now I have made a
> new patch based on the
> newest uq/master where the patch has been applied to fix these bugs,
> is it feasible? If it is
> not acceptable, should I re-gener
From: BrillyWu
Hi, Jan
I'm very sorry for these bugs in the patch. Now I have made a
new patch based on the
newest uq/master where the patch has been applied to fix these bugs,
is it feasible? If it is
not acceptable, should I re-generate a patch based on previous
uq/master, or what else
Hi, Jan
>
> > @@ -855,6 +870,8 @@ int cpu_x86_register (CPUX86State *env,
> > env->cpuid_xlevel = def->xlevel;
> > env->cpuid_kvm_features = def->kvm_features;
> > env->cpuid_svm_features = def->svm_features;
> > +env->cpuid_ext4_features = def->ext4_features;
> > +env->cpui
On 2011-05-10 10:02, BrillyWu wrote:
> From: BrillyWu
>
> When KVM is running on VIA CPU with host cpu's model, the
> feautures of VIA CPU will be passed into kvm guest by calling
> the CPUID instruction for Centaur.
>
> Signed-off-by: BrillyWu
> Signed-off-by: KaryJin
...
> @@ -855,6 +870,8 @
On 2011-05-10 10:02, BrillyWu wrote:
> From: BrillyWu
>
> When KVM is running on VIA CPU with host cpu's model, the
> feautures of VIA CPU will be passed into kvm guest by calling
> the CPUID instruction for Centaur.
>
> Signed-off-by: BrillyWu
> Signed-off-by: KaryJin
> ---
> target-i386/cpu.h
On 05/10/2011 11:02 AM, BrillyWu wrote:
From: BrillyWu
When KVM is running on VIA CPU with host cpu's model, the
feautures of VIA CPU will be passed into kvm guest by calling
the CPUID instruction for Centaur.
Applied, thanks.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
From: BrillyWu
When KVM is running on VIA CPU with host cpu's model, the
feautures of VIA CPU will be passed into kvm guest by calling
the CPUID instruction for Centaur.
Signed-off-by: BrillyWu
Signed-off-by: KaryJin
---
target-i386/cpu.h |3 +++
target-i386/cpuid.c | 46 +++
14 matches
Mail list logo
