On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
>> >> +void cpu_tlb_flush(CPUState *cpu, bool flush_global)
>> >> +{
>> >> + CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
>> >> +
>> >> + g_assert(cc->tlb_flush != NULL);
>> >> +
>> >> + cc->tlb_flush(cpu, flush_global);
>> >> +}
>> >
>> > This nee
> >> +void cpu_tlb_flush(CPUState *cpu, bool flush_global)
> >> +{
> >> +CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
> >> +
> >> +g_assert(cc->tlb_flush != NULL);
> >> +
> >> +cc->tlb_flush(cpu, flush_global);
> >> +}
> >
> > This needs to be able to call tlb_flush() itself
> > rather than havi
Am 30.05.2012 09:53, schrieb Alexander Graf:
> Mind to elaborate (in the patch description maybe) why we need a CPU specific
> TLB flush callback that merely calls the globally visible tlb_flush? :)
Ouch! That's one patch description I forgot to fill in. :-/
The issue is that env is defined in X
Am 30.05.2012 11:28, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 23 May 2012 04:08, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> +void cpu_tlb_flush(CPUState *cpu, bool flush_global)
>> +{
>> +CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
>> +
>> +g_assert(cc->tlb_flush != NULL);
>> +
>> +cc->tlb_flush(cpu, flush_global);
>> +}
>
On 23 May 2012 04:08, Andreas Färber wrote:
> +void cpu_tlb_flush(CPUState *cpu, bool flush_global)
> +{
> + CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
> +
> + g_assert(cc->tlb_flush != NULL);
> +
> + cc->tlb_flush(cpu, flush_global);
> +}
This needs to be able to call tlb_flush() itself
rather
Mind to elaborate (in the patch description maybe) why we need a CPU specific
TLB flush callback that merely calls the globally visible tlb_flush? :)
Alex
On 23.05.2012, at 05:08, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
On 30.05.2012, at 10:48, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 09:53:20AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Mind to elaborate (in the patch description maybe) why we need a CPU
>> specific TLB flush callback that merely calls the globally visible
>> tlb_flush? :)
>
> For future ex
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 09:53:20AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Mind to elaborate (in the patch description maybe) why we need a CPU specific
> TLB flush callback that merely calls the globally visible tlb_flush? :)
For future extension? ;)
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Sy
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
---
include/qemu/cpu.h | 12
qom/cpu.c |9 +
target-alpha/cpu.c | 16
target-arm/cpu.c| 10 ++
target-cris/cpu.c | 10 ++
target-i386/cpu.c
