On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 14:56:23 +1000
David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:12:04AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 10:23:57 +1000
> > David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 07:50:12PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > > ics_set_kvm_state_one() is called either
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:12:04AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 10:23:57 +1000
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 07:50:12PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > ics_set_kvm_state_one() is called either during reset, in which case
> > > both 'saved priority' and 'current
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 10:23:57 +1000
David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 07:50:12PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > ics_set_kvm_state_one() is called either during reset, in which case
> > both 'saved priority' and 'current priority' are equal to 0xff, or
> > during migration. In the latter ca
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 07:50:12PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> ics_set_kvm_state_one() is called either during reset, in which case
> both 'saved priority' and 'current priority' are equal to 0xff, or
> during migration. In the latter case, 'saved priority' may differ
> from 'current priority' only i
Patchew URL:
https://patchew.org/QEMU/156217621200.562209.8968691631915806468.st...@bahia.lan/
Hi,
This series failed the asan build test. Please find the testing commands and
their output below. If you have Docker installed, you can probably reproduce it
locally.
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!
ics_set_kvm_state_one() is called either during reset, in which case
both 'saved priority' and 'current priority' are equal to 0xff, or
during migration. In the latter case, 'saved priority' may differ
from 'current priority' only if the interrupt had been masked with
the ibm,int-off RTAS call. Ins
