On 2015-12-03 13:19, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2015-12-02 10:36, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 12/01/2015 08:32 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > >On 2015-12-01 08:19, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > >>If there are a lot of guest memory ops in the TB, the amount of
> > >>code generated by tcg_out_tb_fi
On 2015-12-02 10:36, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 12/01/2015 08:32 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >On 2015-12-01 08:19, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >>If there are a lot of guest memory ops in the TB, the amount of
> >>code generated by tcg_out_tb_finalize could be well more than 1k.
> >>In the short t
On 12/01/2015 08:32 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On 2015-12-01 08:19, Richard Henderson wrote:
If there are a lot of guest memory ops in the TB, the amount of
code generated by tcg_out_tb_finalize could be well more than 1k.
In the short term, increase the reservation larger than any TB
seen in pra
On 1 December 2015 at 23:06, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 12/01/2015 08:40 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> That said the problem reported is likely fixed by this commit that went
>> just after it has been reported:
>
>
> It does seem likely, but I don't see how we can know that the out size is
> 110
On 12/01/2015 08:40 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On 2015-12-01 17:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On 2015-12-01 16:28, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 1 December 2015 at 16:19, Richard Henderson wrote:
If there are a lot of guest memory ops in the TB, the amount of
code generated by tcg_out_tb_finalize could
On 12/01/2015 08:28 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 1 December 2015 at 16:19, Richard Henderson wrote:
If there are a lot of guest memory ops in the TB, the amount of
code generated by tcg_out_tb_finalize could be well more than 1k.
In the short term, increase the reservation larger than any TB
see
On 2015-12-01 17:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2015-12-01 16:28, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 1 December 2015 at 16:19, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > > If there are a lot of guest memory ops in the TB, the amount of
> > > code generated by tcg_out_tb_finalize could be well more than 1k.
> > > In th
On 2015-12-01 16:28, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 1 December 2015 at 16:19, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > If there are a lot of guest memory ops in the TB, the amount of
> > code generated by tcg_out_tb_finalize could be well more than 1k.
> > In the short term, increase the reservation larger than an
On 2015-12-01 08:19, Richard Henderson wrote:
> If there are a lot of guest memory ops in the TB, the amount of
> code generated by tcg_out_tb_finalize could be well more than 1k.
> In the short term, increase the reservation larger than any TB
> seen in practice.
>
> Reported-by: Aurelien Jarno
On 1 December 2015 at 16:19, Richard Henderson wrote:
> If there are a lot of guest memory ops in the TB, the amount of
> code generated by tcg_out_tb_finalize could be well more than 1k.
> In the short term, increase the reservation larger than any TB
> seen in practice.
>
> Reported-by: Aurelien
If there are a lot of guest memory ops in the TB, the amount of
code generated by tcg_out_tb_finalize could be well more than 1k.
In the short term, increase the reservation larger than any TB
seen in practice.
Reported-by: Aurelien Jarno
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
Reported and discus
11 matches
Mail list logo
