On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 12:47:37PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> ACPI0004 seems too new:
> Windows XP complains about an unrecognized device.
> This is a regression since 1.7.
> Use PNP0A06 instead - Generic Container Device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
ping
Just making sure we d
On Sun, 6 Apr 2014 12:47:37 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> ACPI0004 seems too new:
> Windows XP complains about an unrecognized device.
> This is a regression since 1.7.
> Use PNP0A06 instead - Generic Container Device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> ---
>
> Note: Igor has RFC pa
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:57:02AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Apr 2014 12:47:37 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > ACPI0004 seems too new:
> > Windows XP complains about an unrecognized device.
> > This is a regression since 1.7.
> > Use PNP0A06 instead - Generic Container Dev
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:46:34AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Apr 2014 12:47:37 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > ACPI0004 seems too new:
> > Windows XP complains about an unrecognized device.
> > This is a regression since 1.7.
> > Use PNP0A06 instead - Generic Container Dev
On Sun, 6 Apr 2014 12:47:37 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> ACPI0004 seems too new:
> Windows XP complains about an unrecognized device.
> This is a regression since 1.7.
> Use PNP0A06 instead - Generic Container Device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> ---
>
> Note: Igor has RFC pa
ACPI0004 seems too new:
Windows XP complains about an unrecognized device.
This is a regression since 1.7.
Use PNP0A06 instead - Generic Container Device.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
---
Note: Igor has RFC patches to use PNP0C02 under PCI0,
but that's not ready for 2.0.
Igor, could you com
