Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH alt 1/7] block: Add status callback to bdrv_amend_options()

2014-08-01 Thread Max Reitz
On 31.07.2014 09:51, Benoît Canet wrote: The Saturday 26 Jul 2014 à 21:22:05 (+0200), Max Reitz wrote : Depending on the changed options and the image format, bdrv_amend_options() may take a significant amount of time. In these cases, a way to be informed about the operation's status is desirab

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH alt 1/7] block: Add status callback to bdrv_amend_options()

2014-07-31 Thread Benoît Canet
The Thursday 31 Jul 2014 à 09:51:05 (+0200), Benoît Canet wrote : > The Saturday 26 Jul 2014 à 21:22:05 (+0200), Max Reitz wrote : > > > Depending on the changed options and the image format, > > bdrv_amend_options() may take a significant amount of time. In these > > cases, a way to be informed a

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH alt 1/7] block: Add status callback to bdrv_amend_options()

2014-07-31 Thread Benoît Canet
The Saturday 26 Jul 2014 à 21:22:05 (+0200), Max Reitz wrote : > Depending on the changed options and the image format, > bdrv_amend_options() may take a significant amount of time. In these > cases, a way to be informed about the operation's status is desirable. > > Since the operation is rather

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH alt 1/7] block: Add status callback to bdrv_amend_options()

2014-07-26 Thread Max Reitz
Depending on the changed options and the image format, bdrv_amend_options() may take a significant amount of time. In these cases, a way to be informed about the operation's status is desirable. Since the operation is rather complex and may fundamentally change the image, implementing it as AIO or