Am 07.08.2013 um 05:00 hat Wenchao Xia geschrieben:
> This series brings internal snapshot support at block devices level, now we
> have two three methods to do block snapshot lively: 1) backing chain,
> 2) internal one and 3) drive-back up approach.
>
> Comparation:
> Advantages:
Am 07.08.2013 um 05:00 hat Wenchao Xia geschrieben:
> This series brings internal snapshot support at block devices level, now we
> have two three methods to do block snapshot lively: 1) backing chain,
> 2) internal one and 3) drive-back up approach.
>
> Comparation:
> Advantages:
于 2013-8-16 23:36, Stefan Hajnoczi 写道:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 11:00:11AM +0800, Wenchao Xia wrote:
v6:
Address Stefan's comments:
2/8: macro STR_PRINT_CHAR was renamed as STR_OR_NULL, and moved into patch 5,
since implement function in this patch do not printf snapshot id any more, as
Kev
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 11:00:11AM +0800, Wenchao Xia wrote:
> v6:
> Address Stefan's comments:
> 2/8: macro STR_PRINT_CHAR was renamed as STR_OR_NULL, and moved into patch
> 5,
> since implement function in this patch do not printf snapshot id any more, as
> Kevin's suggestion.
Great.
> A
于 2013-8-7 11:00, Wenchao Xia 写道:
>This series brings internal snapshot support at block devices level, now we
> have two three methods to do block snapshot lively: 1) backing chain,
> 2) internal one and 3) drive-back up approach.
>
> Comparation:
> Advantages:
This series brings internal snapshot support at block devices level, now we
have two three methods to do block snapshot lively: 1) backing chain,
2) internal one and 3) drive-back up approach.
Comparation:
Advantages:Disadvantages:
1)delta data, taken
