Hi Paolo,
Thank you for the correction! Greatly appreciated and it worked.
I tested all combinations of Linux host using virtual Socket-CAN and pcm3680
and mioe3680 client QEmu Linux environments using Linux Socket-CAN drivers,
sending and receiving from each-other (all combinations; host-
Hi Pavel, Paolo,
I tried to rerun my environment to test however it seems the interface has
changed a little and my standard program options cause complaints.
Unfortunately I don’t have too much time to dig through at the moment.
My standard startup command is:
$ ./qemu-local/bin/qemu-system-i
On 30/01/2018 20:08, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 30/01/2018 19:13, Deniz Eren wrote:
>> Hi Pavel, Paolo,
>>
>> I tried to rerun my environment to test however it seems the interface has
>> changed a little and my standard program options cause complaints.
>> Unfortunately I don’t have too much time
On 30/01/2018 19:13, Deniz Eren wrote:
> Hi Pavel, Paolo,
>
> I tried to rerun my environment to test however it seems the interface has
> changed a little and my standard program options cause complaints.
> Unfortunately I don’t have too much time to dig through at the moment.
>
> My standard
Hello Paolo,
thanks much for conversion to acceptable QOM model.
On Tuesday 30 of January 2018 15:15:22 Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/01/2018 22:33, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> > Hello Paolo,
> >
> > thanks for suggestions. I understand and fully agree with your
> > request to switch to QOM. I have succee
On 25/01/2018 22:33, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Hello Paolo,
>
> thanks for suggestions. I understand and fully agree with your
> request to switch to QOM. I have succeed with that for CAN devices
> some time ago. It worth to be done for the rest of the objects
> but I fear that I do not find time to com
Hi,
On 28.01.2018 10:02, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Hello Paolo,
>
> On Friday 26 of January 2018 12:12:32 Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Coincidentially, I have some time on a flight next Monday. :) I
>> obviously cannot really _test_ anything, but I can at least do the
>> changes below and set up all the QO
Hello Paolo,
On Friday 26 of January 2018 12:12:32 Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Coincidentially, I have some time on a flight next Monday. :) I
> obviously cannot really _test_ anything, but I can at least do the
> changes below and set up all the QOM boilerplate.
thanks much for offer to help.
Deniz
On 25/01/2018 22:33, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Hello Paolo,
>
> thanks for suggestions. I understand and fully agree with your
> request to switch to QOM. I have succeed with that for CAN devices
> some time ago. It worth to be done for the rest of the objects
> but I fear that I do not find time to com
Hello Paolo,
thanks for suggestions. I understand and fully agree with your
request to switch to QOM. I have succeed with that for CAN devices
some time ago. It worth to be done for the rest of the objects
but I fear that I do not find time to complete QOMification
in reasonable future. Contributi
On 23/01/2018 22:42, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Do you think QOM based? I would like it to be implemented
> that way but I need some assistance where to look how this
> object kind should be implemented and from which base object
> inherit from. But I prefer to left that for later work.
>
> I would defin
Hi Pavel, Philippe,
I’m happy with whatever way is best for the project.
However I would personally think merging the different drivers into one C file
would not be a very modular way of handling the problem. As you can see from
the Advantech drivers for example, the card supplier end can pose
Hello Philippe,
On Wednesday 24 of January 2018 22:41:16 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
> > I have seen that a few other type_init-s do more
> > than simple sequence of type_register_static().
> > Is it acceptable to use type_init for registration
> > to CAN core by function call for no
Hi Pavel,
On 01/24/2018 05:22 PM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> On Tuesday 23 of January 2018 22:42:31 Pavel Pisa wrote:
>> When Linux specific object file is linked in then some local
>> function needs to be called before QOM instances population.
>> I know how to do that GCC specific
Hello everybody,
On Tuesday 23 of January 2018 22:42:31 Pavel Pisa wrote:
> When Linux specific object file is linked in then some local
> function needs to be called before QOM instances population.
> I know how to do that GCC specific/non-portable way
>
> static void __attribute__((constructor))
Hello Philippe,
On Monday 22 of January 2018 12:35:33 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> On 01/14/2018 05:14 PM, p...@cmp.felk.cvut.cz wrote:
>
> I think your series is quite ready to get accepted, although I'm not
> sure through with tree it will goes.
>
> Most of my review comments ar
Hi Pavel,
On 01/14/2018 05:14 PM, p...@cmp.felk.cvut.cz wrote:
> From: Pavel Pisa
>
> Basic emulation of CAN bus controller and interconnection for QEMU.
>
> Patches version 4:
> Resolve comments longer than 80 characters to suppress
> all warnings reported by scripts/checkpatch.pl.
> Follow al
From: Pavel Pisa
Basic emulation of CAN bus controller and interconnection for QEMU.
Patches version 4:
Resolve comments longer than 80 characters to suppress
all warnings reported by scripts/checkpatch.pl.
Follow all suggestions from Frederic Konrad review.
Replace all printf and perror calls b
18 matches
Mail list logo
