On 24 November 2011 21:46, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 24.11.2011 22:31, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 24 November 2011 20:19, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 24.11.2011 20:41, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 22 November 2011 04:34, Peter Chubb wrote:
> +obj-arm-y += imx_serial.o imx_timer.o imx_a
Am 24.11.2011 22:31, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 24 November 2011 20:19, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 24.11.2011 20:41, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>>> On 22 November 2011 04:34, Peter Chubb wrote:
+obj-arm-y += imx_serial.o imx_timer.o imx_avic.o
+obj-arm-y += kzm.o
>>>
>>> It would be bette
On 24 November 2011 20:19, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 24.11.2011 20:41, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 22 November 2011 04:34, Peter Chubb wrote:
>>> +obj-arm-y += imx_serial.o imx_timer.o imx_avic.o
>>> +obj-arm-y += kzm.o
>>
>> It would be better to add the devices to the makefile in their
>> cor
Am 24.11.2011 20:41, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 22 November 2011 04:34, Peter Chubb wrote:
>> +obj-arm-y += imx_serial.o imx_timer.o imx_avic.o
>> +obj-arm-y += kzm.o
>
> It would be better to add the devices to the makefile in their
> corresponding patches, I think. (Don't feel too strongly abo
On 22 November 2011 04:34, Peter Chubb wrote:
> Board support for Kyoto Micro's KZM-ARM11-01, an evaluation board built
> around the FreeScale i.MX31.
This patch mostly looks OK to me.
> +obj-arm-y += imx_serial.o imx_timer.o imx_avic.o
> +obj-arm-y += kzm.o
It would be better to add the device
Board support for Kyoto Micro's KZM-ARM11-01, an evaluation board built
around the FreeScale i.MX31.
Signed-off-by: Hans Jang
Signed-off-by: Adam Clench
Signed-off-by: Peter Chubb
---
Makefile.target |2
hw/kzm.c| 155
2 fi
