On 28 June 2016 at 09:19, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
>> On 27 June 2016 at 07:34, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Peter Maydell writes:
This is third-party code. We're not going to change it, so
we should avoid scanning it rather than adding tags which
will g
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 27 June 2016 at 07:34, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Peter Maydell writes:
>>> This is third-party code. We're not going to change it, so
>>> we should avoid scanning it rather than adding tags which
>>> will get lost next time we do an update to a new upstream
>>> vers
On 27 June 2016 at 07:34, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>> This is third-party code. We're not going to change it, so
>> we should avoid scanning it rather than adding tags which
>> will get lost next time we do an update to a new upstream
>> version...
>
> I can revive v1's bl
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 24 June 2016 at 15:19, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> For now, this tests just a bit of header sanity: for each header
>> "FOO.h", test whether
>>
>> #include "qemu/osdep.h"
>> #include "FOO.h"
>> #include "FOO.h"
>>
>> compiles. A large number of
On 24 June 2016 at 15:19, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> For now, this tests just a bit of header sanity: for each header
> "FOO.h", test whether
>
> #include "qemu/osdep.h"
> #include "FOO.h"
> #include "FOO.h"
>
> compiles. A large number of headers don't pass this test, by
