Am 29.04.2013 12:29, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:22:10 +0200
> Andreas Färber wrote:
>
>> Necessary to change the name of ICCDevice's parent object field.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
>> ---
>> Could any of the APIC experts please review whether I'm touching any hot
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:22:10 +0200
Andreas Färber wrote:
> Necessary to change the name of ICCDevice's parent object field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
> ---
> Could any of the APIC experts please review whether I'm touching any hot
> path?
> Not sure if this was a mix of pre- and post
On 2013-04-28 15:53, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 28.04.2013 15:03, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
>> On 2013-04-28 13:22, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Necessary to change the name of ICCDevice's parent object field.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber --- Could any of
>>> the APIC experts please review whether
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 28.04.2013 15:03, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
> On 2013-04-28 13:22, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Necessary to change the name of ICCDevice's parent object field.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber --- Could any of
>> the APIC experts please review whether I
On 2013-04-28 13:22, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Necessary to change the name of ICCDevice's parent object field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
> ---
> Could any of the APIC experts please review whether I'm touching any hot
> path?
> Not sure if this was a mix of pre- and post-QOM code or int
Necessary to change the name of ICCDevice's parent object field.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
---
Could any of the APIC experts please review whether I'm touching any hot path?
Not sure if this was a mix of pre- and post-QOM code or intentional... Thanks.
hw/i386/kvm/apic.c | 4 ++--
