Hi there.. ping. Hey, what do you think about this all?
On 12.02.2016 21:00, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Hi all!
These series are derived from my 'Dirty bitmaps migration' series. The
core idea is switch to postcopy migration and drop usage of meta
bitmaps.
These patches provide dirty
Juan, have you had the chance to look at this yet?
--js
On 03/14/2016 07:37 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> ping
>
> On 12.02.2016 21:00, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> These series are derived from my 'Dirty bitmaps migration' series. The
>> core idea is switch t
ping
On 12.02.2016 21:00, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Hi all!
These series are derived from my 'Dirty bitmaps migration' series. The
core idea is switch to postcopy migration and drop usage of meta
bitmaps.
These patches provide dirty bitmap postcopy migration feature. Only
named dirty
Oh, sorry, significant note:
These patches are based on Fam's [PATCH v2 00/13] Dirty bitmap changes
for migration/persistence work
On 12.02.2016 21:00, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Hi all!
These series are derived from my 'Dirty bitmaps migration' series. The
core idea is switch to p
Hi all!
These series are derived from my 'Dirty bitmaps migration' series. The
core idea is switch to postcopy migration and drop usage of meta
bitmaps.
These patches provide dirty bitmap postcopy migration feature. Only
named dirty bitmaps are to be migrated. Migration may be enabled using
migra
