On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 05:02:37PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 04:16:20PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Aurelien Jarno
>
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 04:42:05PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:37:00PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Laurent Desnogues
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 05:02:37PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 04:16:20PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Aurelien Jarno
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:30:17PM +0300, B
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 04:42:05PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:37:00PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Laurent Desnogues
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Blue Swi
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 04:16:20PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:30:17PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Aurelien Jarno
>
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 04:16:20PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:30:17PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Aurelien Jarno
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 02:12:27PM +0300, B
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:37:00PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Laurent Desnogues
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >>> x86_64 uses r14 as TCG_AREG0. Despite the
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:30:17PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 02:12:27PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Aurelien Jarno
>
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:37:00PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Laurent Desnogues
> wrote:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > [...]
> >>> x86_64 uses r14 as TCG_AREG0. Despite the instructions being quite
> >>> simple (only 2 movi_i32), the r
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:30:17PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 02:12:27PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Aurelien Jarno
> >> wrote:
> >> > I still don't get where are this list of po
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Laurent Desnogues
wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> [...]
>>> x86_64 uses r14 as TCG_AREG0. Despite the instructions being quite
>>> simple (only 2 movi_i32), the resulting code makes 2 access to env to
>>> save the two registers. Havin
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 02:33:55PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 02:03:40PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Laurent Desnogues
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 02:12:27PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> > I still don't get where are this list of possible changes? Did I miss
>> > something in another thread?
>>
>> I'm ref
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
[...]
>> x86_64 uses r14 as TCG_AREG0. Despite the instructions being quite
>> simple (only 2 movi_i32), the resulting code makes 2 access to env to
>> save the two registers. Having to reload the env pointer each time to a
>> register would clear
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 02:33:55PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 02:03:40PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Laurent Desnogues
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Blue Sw
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 02:12:27PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I still don't get where are this list of possible changes? Did I miss
> > something in another thread?
>
> I'm referring to the patches I sent.
Ok, patches 1, 2 and 4 to 7 loo
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 02:03:40PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Laurent Desnogues
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Aurelien Jarno
>>
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 02:03:40PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Laurent Desnogues
> wrote:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Aurelien Jarno
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:52:35AM +0300, Blue
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:58:49PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Aurelien Jarno
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:15:52AM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Aurelien Jarn
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Laurent Desnogues
wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:52:35AM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Aurelien Jarno
w
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:58:49PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:15:52AM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Aurelien Jarno
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:52:35AM +0300,
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:15:52AM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:52:35AM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:27:17AM +0200, Laurent Desnogues wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Aurelien Jarno
> > wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:52:35AM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Aurelien
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:52:35AM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Aurelien Jarno
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:35:20PM +0300, Blue Swirl w
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:15:52AM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:52:35AM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Aurelien Jarno
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:35:20PM +0300,
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:52:35AM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Aurelien Jarno
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:35:20PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> >> Here's a RFC series for eliminating AREG0.
>>
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:16:16PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:35:20PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > Here's a RFC series for eliminating AREG0.
> >
> > Blue Swirl (11):
> > Move user emulator stuff from cpu-exec.c to user-exec.c
> > Delete unused tb_invalidate_page
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:52:35AM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:35:20PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> Here's a RFC series for eliminating AREG0.
> >>
> >> Blue Swirl (11):
> >> Move user emulator stuff from cpu-
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:35:20PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> Here's a RFC series for eliminating AREG0.
>>
>> Blue Swirl (11):
>> Move user emulator stuff from cpu-exec.c to user-exec.c
>> Delete unused tb_invalidate_page_range
>>
>>
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:35:20PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> Here's a RFC series for eliminating AREG0.
>
> Blue Swirl (11):
> Move user emulator stuff from cpu-exec.c to user-exec.c
> Delete unused tb_invalidate_page_range
>
> The above should be OK to commit.
>
> cpu_loop_exit: avoid us
Here's a RFC series for eliminating AREG0.
Blue Swirl (11):
Move user emulator stuff from cpu-exec.c to user-exec.c
Delete unused tb_invalidate_page_range
The above should be OK to commit.
cpu_loop_exit: avoid using AREG0
Delegate setup of TCG temporaries to targets
These two are not, u
31 matches
Mail list logo