On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 09:01:41AM -0400, Jeff Cody wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 05:01:46PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > Previously, nbd calls drive_get_ref() on the drive of bs. A BDS doesn't
> > always have associated dinfo, which nbd doesn't care either. We already
> > have BDS ref count, so
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 05:01:46PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Previously, nbd calls drive_get_ref() on the drive of bs. A BDS doesn't
> always have associated dinfo, which nbd doesn't care either. We already
> have BDS ref count, so use it to make it safe for a BDS w/o blockdev.
>
> Signed-off-by:
Previously, nbd calls drive_get_ref() on the drive of bs. A BDS doesn't
always have associated dinfo, which nbd doesn't care either. We already
have BDS ref count, so use it to make it safe for a BDS w/o blockdev.
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
---
blockdev-nbd.c | 10 +-
nbd.c | 5 +
