On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 09:46:52PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 04:57, David Gibson
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 02:27:43PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > Oops, ignore this one folks. As is probably obvious, this was a
> > testing patch not meant to go into the
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 04:57, David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 02:27:43PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>
> Oops, ignore this one folks. As is probably obvious, this was a
> testing patch not meant to go into the main series.
Actually I'm not sure what would be the correct way to calc
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 02:27:43PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
Oops, ignore this one folks. As is probably obvious, this was a
testing patch not meant to go into the main series.
> ---
> dma.h |9 ++---
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dma.h b/dma.h
>
---
dma.h |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dma.h b/dma.h
index b8cfd1d..ee540f4 100644
--- a/dma.h
+++ b/dma.h
@@ -18,10 +18,13 @@
typedef struct ScatterGatherEntry ScatterGatherEntry;
#if defined(TARGET_PHYS_ADDR_BITS)
-typedef target_phys_addr_
