On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 03:47:57PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/05/2017 10:03 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Currently the QIOTaskFunc signature takes an Object * for
> > the source, and an Error * for any error. We also need to
> > be able to provide a result pointer. Rather than continue
>
On 01/05/2017 10:03 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Currently the QIOTaskFunc signature takes an Object * for
> the source, and an Error * for any error. We also need to
> be able to provide a result pointer. Rather than continue
> to add parameters to QIOTaskFunc, remove the existing
> ones and si
Currently the QIOTaskFunc signature takes an Object * for
the source, and an Error * for any error. We also need to
be able to provide a result pointer. Rather than continue
to add parameters to QIOTaskFunc, remove the existing
ones and simply pass the QIOTask object instead. This
has methods to ac