* Dong Jia Shi [2017-09-26 15:48:56 +0800]:
[...]
> > >
> > > Tried to test with the following method:
> > > 1. Start g1 (first level guest on kvm a host) with a virtio blk device
> > >defined:
> > > -drive
> > > file=/dev/disk/by-path/ccw-0.0.3f3e,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk1,format=raw
* Cornelia Huck [2017-09-21 10:54:02 +0200]:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:45:47 +0800
> Dong Jia Shi wrote:
>
> > * Cornelia Huck [2017-09-07 10:08:17 +0200]:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > I'm thinking of a method these days:
> > > > Could passing through an fully emulated ccw device (e.g. 3270), or
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:45:47 +0800
Dong Jia Shi wrote:
> * Cornelia Huck [2017-09-07 10:08:17 +0200]:
>
> [...]
>
> > > I'm thinking of a method these days:
> > > Could passing through an fully emulated ccw device (e.g. 3270), or a
> > > virtio ccw device, in the level 1 kvm guest to a level 2
* Cornelia Huck [2017-09-07 10:08:17 +0200]:
[...]
> > I'm thinking of a method these days:
> > Could passing through an fully emulated ccw device (e.g. 3270), or a
> > virtio ccw device, in the level 1 kvm guest to a level 2 guest be a test
> > method for this?
> >
> > All of the CCWs will be
* Halil Pasic [2017-09-08 12:28:03 +0200]:
[snip]
> > What Halil pointed out is that the ccw_cb implementation of 3270
> > emulation does not take care of IDALs. This is true.
> >
> > I can also do that right after this series, if Halil agrees.
> > (The 3270 emulation authors are busy of other
On 09/08/2017 04:01 AM, Dong Jia Shi wrote:
> * Cornelia Huck [2017-09-07 12:52:20 +0200]:
>
>> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:21:50 +0200
>> Halil Pasic wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/07/2017 10:08 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:31:09 +0800
Dong Jia Shi wrote:
>>
> I'm thinking of
* Cornelia Huck [2017-09-07 12:52:20 +0200]:
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:21:50 +0200
> Halil Pasic wrote:
>
> > On 09/07/2017 10:08 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:31:09 +0800
> > > Dong Jia Shi wrote:
>
> > >> I'm thinking of a method these days:
> > >> Could passing through
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 11:10:17 +0200
Janosch Frank wrote:
> The thing is that I want to test the subchannel and not the device and
> therefore I really do not want to have to issue control commands to a
> device in order to get data. Having a device that reads and writes
> without a lot of overhead
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:21:50 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On 09/07/2017 10:08 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:31:09 +0800
> > Dong Jia Shi wrote:
> >> I'm thinking of a method these days:
> >> Could passing through an fully emulated ccw device (e.g. 3270), or a
> >> virtio ccw d
On 09/07/2017 10:08 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:31:09 +0800
> Dong Jia Shi wrote:
>
>> * Cornelia Huck [2017-09-06 15:18:21 +0200]:
>>
>>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 13:16:45 +0200
>>> Halil Pasic wrote:
>>>
Add a fake device meant for testing the correctness of our css
[...]
> The main problem here is that you want to exercise a middle layer (the
> css code) and need to write boilerplate code on both host and guest
> side in order to be able to do so.
>
Nod.
> In general, a device that accepts arbitrary channel programs l
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:16:29 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On 09/06/2017 05:20 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 16:24:13 +0200
> > Halil Pasic wrote:
> >
> >> On 09/06/2017 03:18 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 13:16:45 +0200
> >>> Halil Pasic wrote:
> >>>
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:31:09 +0800
Dong Jia Shi wrote:
> * Cornelia Huck [2017-09-06 15:18:21 +0200]:
>
> > On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 13:16:45 +0200
> > Halil Pasic wrote:
> >
> > > Add a fake device meant for testing the correctness of our css emulation.
> > >
> > > What we currently have is wri
* Cornelia Huck [2017-09-06 15:18:21 +0200]:
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 13:16:45 +0200
> Halil Pasic wrote:
>
> > Add a fake device meant for testing the correctness of our css emulation.
> >
> > What we currently have is writing a Fibonacci sequence of uint32_t to the
> > device via ccw write. The
On 09/06/2017 05:20 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 16:24:13 +0200
> Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>> On 09/06/2017 03:18 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 13:16:45 +0200
>>> Halil Pasic wrote:
>>>
Add a fake device meant for testing the correctness of our css emula
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 16:24:13 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On 09/06/2017 03:18 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 13:16:45 +0200
> > Halil Pasic wrote:
> >
> >> Add a fake device meant for testing the correctness of our css emulation.
> >>
> >> What we currently have is writing a Fi
On 09/06/2017 03:18 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 13:16:45 +0200
> Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>> Add a fake device meant for testing the correctness of our css emulation.
>>
>> What we currently have is writing a Fibonacci sequence of uint32_t to the
>> device via ccw write. The writ
On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 13:16:45 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
> Add a fake device meant for testing the correctness of our css emulation.
>
> What we currently have is writing a Fibonacci sequence of uint32_t to the
> device via ccw write. The write is going to fail if it ain't a Fibonacci
> and indicat
Add a fake device meant for testing the correctness of our css emulation.
What we currently have is writing a Fibonacci sequence of uint32_t to the
device via ccw write. The write is going to fail if it ain't a Fibonacci
and indicate a device exception in scsw together with the proper residual
cou
19 matches
Mail list logo
