On 16/03/2016 12:16, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> > Using uint32_t is enough and avoids the need to include ioport.h
>> > everywhere.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
> I'm not hugely convinced by this patch -- I think it's nice
> to have a typedef that indicates that you're dealing with an
>
On 16 March 2016 at 10:46, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Using uint32_t is enough and avoids the need to include ioport.h everywhere.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
I'm not hugely convinced by this patch -- I think it's nice
to have a typedef that indicates that you're dealing with an
IO port address
Using uint32_t is enough and avoids the need to include ioport.h everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
hw/core/sysbus.c | 4 ++--
include/exec/ioport.h | 15 ++-
include/hw/sysbus.h | 4 ++--
ioport.c | 12 ++--
xen-hvm.c | 8
