On 20/11/2014 09:24, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 11/20/2014 04:18 PM, Gonglei wrote:
>> On 2014/11/20 16:11, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/20/2014 04:05 PM, Gonglei wrote:
On 2014/11/20 15:50, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> Maybe just initialize iov unconditionally at the beginning and check
>>>
On 2014/11/20 16:24, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 11/20/2014 04:18 PM, Gonglei wrote:
>> On 2014/11/20 16:11, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/20/2014 04:05 PM, Gonglei wrote:
On 2014/11/20 15:50, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> Maybe just initialize iov unconditionally at the beginning and check
On 11/20/2014 04:18 PM, Gonglei wrote:
> On 2014/11/20 16:11, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>> On 11/20/2014 04:05 PM, Gonglei wrote:
>>> On 2014/11/20 15:50, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>
>> Maybe just initialize iov unconditionally at the beginning and check
dot1q_buf instead of iov for the rest of th
On 2014/11/20 16:11, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 11/20/2014 04:05 PM, Gonglei wrote:
>> On 2014/11/20 15:50, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
> Maybe just initialize iov unconditionally at the beginning and check
>>> dot1q_buf instead of iov for the rest of the functions. (Need deal with
>>> size < ETH
On 11/20/2014 04:05 PM, Gonglei wrote:
> On 2014/11/20 15:50, Jason Wang wrote:
>
Maybe just initialize iov unconditionally at the beginning and check
>> dot1q_buf instead of iov for the rest of the functions. (Need deal with
>> size < ETHER_ADDR_LEN * 2)
More complicated, because
On 2014/11/20 15:50, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> Maybe just initialize iov unconditionally at the beginning and check
>>> >> dot1q_buf instead of iov for the rest of the functions. (Need deal with
>>> >> size < ETHER_ADDR_LEN * 2)
>> > More complicated, because we can't initialize iov when
>> > "size <
On 11/20/2014 03:12 PM, Gonglei wrote:
> On 2014/11/20 14:55, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>> On 11/20/2014 02:29 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 20/11/2014 06:57, arei.gong...@huawei.com wrote:
From: Gonglei
Coverity spot:
Assigning: iov = struct iovec [3]({{buf, 12UL},
On 2014/11/20 14:55, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 11/20/2014 02:29 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> On 20/11/2014 06:57, arei.gong...@huawei.com wrote:
>>> From: Gonglei
>>>
>>> Coverity spot:
>>> Assigning: iov = struct iovec [3]({{buf, 12UL},
>>>{(void *)dot1q_buf, 4UL},
>>>
On 11/20/2014 02:29 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 20/11/2014 06:57, arei.gong...@huawei.com wrote:
>> From: Gonglei
>>
>> Coverity spot:
>> Assigning: iov = struct iovec [3]({{buf, 12UL},
>>{(void *)dot1q_buf, 4UL},
>>{buf + 12, size - 12}})
>> (
On 20/11/2014 06:57, arei.gong...@huawei.com wrote:
> From: Gonglei
>
> Coverity spot:
> Assigning: iov = struct iovec [3]({{buf, 12UL},
>{(void *)dot1q_buf, 4UL},
>{buf + 12, size - 12}})
> (address of temporary variable of type struct iovec [3
From: Gonglei
Coverity spot:
Assigning: iov = struct iovec [3]({{buf, 12UL},
{(void *)dot1q_buf, 4UL},
{buf + 12, size - 12}})
(address of temporary variable of type struct iovec [3]).
out_of_scope: Temporary variable of type struct iovec [3] goes
11 matches
Mail list logo