On 06.11.2013, at 17:22, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 06/11/2013 14:04, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
>>> We want to have all the functions that handle directly the dirty
>>> bitmap near. We will change it later.
>>
>> Please move it to exec.c instead.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by:
Il 06/11/2013 17:22, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
>>> >>
>>> >> +static inline void cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_lebitmap(unsigned long
>>> >> *bitmap,
>> >
>> > Why "le"?
> little endian, name is already too long (cpu_physical_memory_ is too
> big as a preffix.)
>
Yeah, I just found we have a m
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 06/11/2013 14:04, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
>> We want to have all the functions that handle directly the dirty
>> bitmap near. We will change it later.
>
> Please move it to exec.c instead.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
>> ---
>> include/exec/memory-physical.h | 3
Il 06/11/2013 14:04, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
> We want to have all the functions that handle directly the dirty
> bitmap near. We will change it later.
Please move it to exec.c instead.
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
> ---
> include/exec/memory-physical.h | 31 +++
We want to have all the functions that handle directly the dirty
bitmap near. We will change it later.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
---
include/exec/memory-physical.h | 31 +++
kvm-all.c | 27 ++-
2 files changed, 33 inser
