On 14/12/15 23:06, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Thomas Huth, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 18:50:49 +0100, wrote:
>>> +default:
>>> +/* Do not assert while we don't manage IP6VERSION */
>>> +/* assert(0); */
>>
>> Not sure if we ever want to have an assert() here - since I assume this
>> could
Thomas Huth, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 18:50:49 +0100, wrote:
> > +default:
> > +/* Do not assert while we don't manage IP6VERSION */
> > +/* assert(0); */
>
> Not sure if we ever want to have an assert() here - since I assume this
> could be triggered by the guest?
No, this is if_en
Samuel Thibault, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 23:06:16 +0100, wrote:
> Thomas Huth, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 18:50:49 +0100, wrote:
> > > +default:
> > > +/* Do not assert while we don't manage IP6VERSION */
> > > +/* assert(0); */
> >
> > Not sure if we ever want to have an assert() here - si
On 14/12/15 14:51, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> From: Guillaume Subiron
>
> In if_encap, a switch is added to prepare for the IPv6 case. Some code
> is factorized.
>
> This prepares for IPv6 support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Subiron
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault
> ---
> slirp/slirp.c | 61
From: Guillaume Subiron
In if_encap, a switch is added to prepare for the IPv6 case. Some code
is factorized.
This prepares for IPv6 support.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Subiron
Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault
---
slirp/slirp.c | 61 ++-
1
