On 01/07/2015 18:06, Peter Hornyack wrote:
> If userspace is controlling the crash capabilities then
> HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_CTL_CONTENTS is not needed.
Actually you still need to: userspace cannot write anything but 0 or
(1ULL << 63). However, the name makes less sense, so I'm in favor of
removing
If userspace is controlling the crash capabilities then
HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_CTL_CONTENTS is not needed.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> On 01/07/15 18:00, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30/06/2015 13:33, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>>>
>>> +#define HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_CTL_NOTIFY
On 01/07/15 18:00, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 30/06/2015 13:33, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
+#define HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_CTL_NOTIFY(1ULL << 63)
+#define HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_CTL_CONTENTS \
+ (HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_CTL_NOTIFY)
Why is HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_CTL_CONTENTS needed? Can I just remov
On 30/06/2015 13:33, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> +#define HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_CTL_NOTIFY (1ULL << 63)
> +#define HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_CTL_CONTENTS\
> + (HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_CTL_NOTIFY)
Why is HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_CTL_CONTENTS needed? Can I just remove it?
Paolo
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> From: Andrey Smetanin
>
> Added Hyper-V crash msrs values - HV_X64_MSR_CRASH*.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smetanin
> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev
> CC: Paolo Bonzini
> CC: Gleb Natapov
Reviewed-by: Peter Hornyack
> ---
> arch/x86/inc
From: Andrey Smetanin
Added Hyper-V crash msrs values - HV_X64_MSR_CRASH*.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Smetanin
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev
CC: Paolo Bonzini
CC: Gleb Natapov
---
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hyperv.h | 15 +++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/inc
